The "Turtle Farm" in Bentota had turtles in small concrete tanks. Is this ethical?
Our tuk-tuk driver took us to a "Sea Turtle Conservation Project." I expected to see nests on the beach, but it was just concrete tanks filled with baby turtles and one big disabled turtle.
They let us pick them up for photos. I felt really weird about it. Are these places actually helping, or are they just tourist traps?
2 Answers
This is a major ethical dilemma in Sri Lanka.
The "Tank" Trap: 90% of the "hatcheries" along the West Coast are commercial businesses. They buy eggs from locals (to stop them from being eaten), but they often keep the babies in tanks too long for tourists to touch/view. This weakens the turtles before release.
The Red Flag: If they let you lift a baby turtle out of the water for a selfie, it is not a good conservation project. The oil from your skin harms them.
The Ethical Alternative: Go to Rekawa Beach (near Tangalle). There are no tanks. You go out at night with wildlifers to watch wild turtles lay eggs on the sand and leave. It is "in-situ" conservation and much more magical (and ethical).
Rekawa Beach, Rekawa Road, Sri Lanka
As a Sri Lankan guide, I will be straight with you. What you described raises real ethical red flags.
Are concrete tanks automatically unethical?
Not automatically. A genuine rescue or rehabilitation centre may use tanks temporarily for injured turtles, quarantine, or short-term care. The ethics come down to why the turtles are there, how long they are kept, and whether the work is run to conservation standards.
The part that feels wrong to you is also the key issue
Letting visitors pick up hatchlings for photos is generally not good practice. Most credible guidance is clear that hatchlings should be released as soon as possible after they emerge, because holding them increases risks like dehydration, exhaustion, overheating, injury, and reduced energy reserves needed for that first critical swim.
Also, many operations that market themselves as “conservation projects” are privately run and heavily tourism-funded. Research focused on Sri Lanka has found that hatcheries can become profit-driven attractions, and their conservation value can be mixed depending on management standards.
So are these places helping, or are they tourist traps?
In Sri Lanka, it can be either.
Some do helpful work, especially if they:
Rescue and rehabilitate injured turtles and can clearly explain release protocols
Collect eggs only when nests are genuinely at risk (poaching, flooding, predation)
Release hatchlings quickly and preferably at night, with minimal disturbance
Do not encourage handling, flash photos, or “holding sessions”
Can show they operate with proper oversight, since sea turtles are legally protected wildlife in Sri Lanka
But if the main experience is “touch turtles, take photos, pay, leave”, and hatchlings are kept around in tanks mainly to be shown to tourists, that is much closer to a tourist trap than a conservation programme.
Quick checklist you can use on the spot
Green flags
Clear education, rules against touching, no flash
Staff can tell you exact release time and location logic
Focus on rehab of injured turtles, not just displaying babies
Red flags
Tourists handling hatchlings
Hatchlings kept for days “so visitors can see them”
No details on permits, records, release practices, or where eggs come from
What you can do next time
Politely say no to handling and photos (that is already a good choice)
Ask: “When do you release these hatchlings, and do you release them the same night they emerge?”
If you want an ethical turtle experience, choose night-time turtle watching on a nesting beach with strict rules, rather than a daytime “turtle farm” setup. (Those beach-based programs are usually closer to real conservation when run properly.)
You must be logged in to post an answer.
Log In to Answer🔥 Popular tags
Related
Fair TukTuk Prices
Help travelers avoid overcharging!
Be the first to report a price